Surveys & Course Evaluations
Run standalone surveys and course evaluations to hear priorities and feedback. Supported input can inform TNA alongside learning records and requests.
What learners completed, and what they thought of it, on one record.
-
Pulse Surveys
Launch to the groups you choose or to everyone, inside a window you open and close. A dry run shows the reach before anything goes out, and people who join after launch can be added to a survey already running.
-
Course Evaluations
Authored in the course builder beside the final assessment, seeded from a standard Kirkpatrick Level 1 template, and shown to the learner as an optional last step. It never holds up the course: someone who skips it has still completed.
-
Evaluations That Fire on Completion
Attach a trigger to a journey or a course and each person is invited the moment they finish it, due a set number of days later — seven by default. One invitation per person per survey, so nobody is asked twice.
-
Anonymous Surveys
Mark a survey anonymous and its answers are reported only in aggregate. Participation stays visible, so you can follow up with the people who have not answered without seeing what anyone said.
-
Questions From the Shared Bank
Likert scales, free text, and 0–10 recommendation scores, drawn from the same question bank as your assessments. Scored question types are kept out, so a survey is never accidentally a test. Once a survey is live its questions lock: no answer is given against text that changed underneath it.
-
Reminders and Reporting
Invitations and one automatic reminder three days before the due date go out in-app, by push, and by email, each naming the survey and reading as your organization asking. Reporting gives the average per scale question, the recommendation score with its breakdown, every free-text answer in full, and response rates per group.
The report
What the report shows, and when it opens
Every survey reports the same way: an average and a distribution per scale question, the recommendation score from the 0–10 question, the free-text answers to read one by one, and how many of each group have answered.
-
Averages you can compare across courses
Each scale question reports a weighted average and the share of answers in each band, so two courses evaluated with the same template can be read side by side, and the same course can be read across cohorts.
-
The recommendation score with its breakdown
The 0–10 question is bucketed into promoters, passives, and detractors, and the net score is shown with the breakdown that produced it, so a strong score from a small group reads as exactly that.
-
Answers separated at submission
When anonymity is on, the link between an answer and the person who gave it is removed at the moment they submit. The report is not filtering identities out of view; there are none in it to filter.
-
Closed until five have answered
An anonymous report opens only once five responses exist, so no answer can be traced to a small group.
Course evaluation
Customer due diligence essentials
The content applied to my role
4.4/5
81%
The pace suited the material
3.9/5
66%
I know where to find the policy behind it
4.6/5
89%
+42
Promoters minus detractors on the 0–10 question
Bring One Requirement. See How Its Record Is Built.
Give us an hour and one real requirement — from your rulebook or from a role profile. You will see how it maps to people, deadlines, and evidence on Salalem.
Book a demo