Compliance teams
Your exposure is not whether people were trained. It is whether you can prove who was required, who completed, and what stands behind it, on the day you are asked.
What gets in the way
Where the exposure actually comes from
-
What's required lives in a document, the training lives elsewhere
A policy names who must be trained and how often. The learning system knows who finished what. Nothing in between holds the mapping, so someone rebuilds it every cycle.
-
Evidence is reconstructed, not retained
Exports, screenshots, and email threads assembled the week before an audit. The reconstruction is itself the risk: it is slow, it is manual, and it is where the gaps surface.
-
Scope drifts quietly
Someone moves into a regulated role and the requirement follows them whether or not the list was updated. Quiet drift is exactly what an auditor samples for.
How Salalem answers it
The record is the deliverable
Describe each requirement once — who it applies to, what satisfies it, how often it renews — and Salalem carries it from there.
Scope is derived from roles rather than from a maintained list, so a move into a regulated role changes what that person needs without a manual step. Completion and assessment proof attaches to the training it satisfies, which is what makes the history a by-product rather than a project. One record shows everyone in scope, what they still owe, where they stand, and the proof behind it, and exports as a sealed pack whose fingerprint anyone can verify. Where we publish a Salalem Compliance Pack for your regulator it arrives already mapped; where we do not, a consult builds it with you.
Other roles
Bring One Requirement. Leave With Its Record.
Give us an hour and one real requirement — from your rulebook or from a role profile. You will see how it maps to people, deadlines, and evidence on Salalem.
Get a Demo