Heads of L&D
You are asked to prove the function's worth in the same quarter you are asked to cover a new regulation, a reorganization, and three product launches. Salalem proposes the journeys; your team reviews them.
What gets in the way
Where the week goes
-
Programs assembled by hand
A new role, a new regulation, or a reorganization means someone rebuilds a program out of the catalog. The work is real, and none of it shows up as an outcome.
-
Assignment goes stale the day it ships
Joiners, transfers, and promotions all change who owes what. Chasing that in a spreadsheet is how a program stays technically live and practically wrong.
-
Reporting completion when you were asked about readiness
A completion percentage answers a question nobody senior asked. The question is which role requirements are met — by role, team, and site.
How Salalem answers it
Proposed journeys your team reviews and publishes
Describe a role and Salalem proposes a learning journey: reusing your best content, suggesting what is missing, with a reason for every step. Your team reviews and publishes.
Assignment follows the org chart, so joiners and transfers receive the training their role needs without anyone assigning it by hand. Required training renews on its own schedule instead of living in a separate spreadsheet. You can see which role requirements are met, by role, team, and site, with completion underneath. Each planning cycle opens with a needs analysis that puts what every role has completed, what the regulator requires, and what managers asked for on one board, then records the decision on each need.
Other roles
Bring One Requirement. See How Its Record Is Built.
Give us an hour and one real requirement — from your rulebook or from a role profile. You will see how it maps to people, deadlines, and evidence on Salalem.
Book a demo